BCL-XL inhibitors enhance the apoptotic efficacy of BRAF inhibitors in BRAFV600E colorectal cancer.

Metastatic BRAFV600E colorectal cancer (CRC) carries an extremely poor prognosis and is in urgent need of effective new treatments. While the BRAFV600E inhibitor encorafenib in combination with the EGFR inhibitor cetuximab (Enc+Cet) was recently approved for this indication, overall survival is only increased by 3.6 months and objective responses are observed in only 20% of patients. We have found that a limitation of Enc+Cet treatment is the failure to efficiently induce apoptosis in BRAFV600E CRCs, despite inducing expression of the pro-apoptotic protein BIM and repressing expression of the pro-survival protein MCL-1. Here, we show that BRAFV600E CRCs express high basal levels of the pro-survival proteins MCL-1 and BCL-XL, and that combining encorafenib with a BCL-XL inhibitor significantly enhances apoptosis in BRAFV600E CRC cell lines. This effect was partially dependent on the induction of BIM, as BIM deletion markedly attenuated BRAF plus BCL-XL inhibitor-induced apoptosis. As thrombocytopenia is an established on-target toxicity of BCL-XL inhibition, we also examined the effect of combining encorafenib with the BCL-XL -targeting PROTAC DT2216, and the novel BCL-2/BCL-XL inhibitor dendrimer conjugate AZD0466. Combining encorafenib with DT2216 significantly increased apoptosis induction in vitro, while combining encorafenib with AZD0466 was well tolerated in mice and further reduced growth of BRAFV600E CRC xenografts compared to either agent alone. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that combined BRAF and BCL-XL inhibition significantly enhances apoptosis in pre-clinical models of BRAFV600E CRC and is a combination regimen worthy of clinical investigation to improve outcomes for these patients.

Near complete remission of an inoperable pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma after BRAF-/MEK-inhibitor treatment-A case report and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic acinar cell carcinomas are rare malignant neoplasms. High-quality evidence about the best treatment strategy is lacking. We present the case of a 52-year-old male with a BRAFV600E -mutated PACC who experienced a complete remission after chemotherapy with BRAF-/MEK-inhibitors. CASE: The patient presented with upper abdomen pain, night sweat, and weight loss. CT scan showed a pancreatic tumor extending from the pancreas head to body. Histological workup identified an acinar cell carcinoma. As the tumor was inoperable, chemotherapy with FOFIRNIOX was initiated and initially showed a slight regression of disease. The regimen had to be discontinued due to severe side effects. Molecular analysis identified a BRAFV600E mutation, so the patient was started on BRAF- and MEK-inhibitors (dabrafenib/trametinib). After 16 months, CT scans showed a near complete remission with a markedly improved overall health. DISCUSSION: Studies suggest that up to one-fourth of PACCs carry a BRAF mutation and might therefore be susceptible to a BRAF-/MEK-inhibitor therapy. This offers a new therapeutic pathway to treat this rare but malignant neoplasm.

BRAF/MEK inhibitor rechallenge in advanced melanoma patients.

BACKGROUND: Effectivity of BRAF(/MEK) inhibitor rechallenge has been described in prior studies. However, structured data are largely lacking. METHODS: Data from all advanced melanoma patients treated with BRAFi(/MEKi) rechallenge were retrieved from the Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry. The authors analyzed objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) for both first treatment and rechallenge. They performed a multivariable logistic regression and a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model to assess factors associated with response and survival. RESULTS: The authors included 468 patients in the largest cohort to date who underwent at least two treatment episodes of BRAFi(/MEKi). Following rechallenge, ORR was 43%, median PFS was 4.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.1-5.2), and median OS was 8.2 months (95% CI, 7.2-9.4). Median PFS after rechallenge for patients who discontinued first BRAFi(/MEKi) treatment due to progression was 3.1 months (95% CI, 2.7-4.0) versus 5.2 months (95% CI, 4.5-5.9) for patients who discontinued treatment for other reasons. Discontinuing first treatment due to progression and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels greater than two times the upper limit of normal were associated with lower odds of response and worse PFS and OS. Symptomatic brain metastases were associated with worse survival, whereas a longer treatment interval between first treatment and rechallenge was associated with better survival. Responding to the first BRAFi(/MEKi) treatment was not associated with response or survival. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that patients benefit from rechallenge. Elevated LDH levels, symptomatic brain metastases, and discontinuing first BRAFi(/MEKi) treatment due to progression are associated with less benefit from rechallenge. A prolonged treatment interval is associated with more benefit from rechallenge.

Acquired Melanocytic Nevi Mimicking Acral Lentiginous Melanoma in a Patient Taking a BRAF Inhibitor.

This case report describes a patient in their 60s with metastatic colon cancer who developed multiple new dark nevi within 2 months of initiating encorafenib and panitumumab therapy.

BRAF-MEK Inhibition in Newly Diagnosed Papillary Craniopharyngiomas.

BACKGROUND: Craniopharyngiomas, primary brain tumors of the pituitary-hypothalamic axis, can cause clinically significant sequelae. Treatment with the use of surgery, radiation, or both is often associated with substantial morbidity related to vision loss, neuroendocrine dysfunction, and memory loss. Genotyping has shown that more than 90% of papillary craniopharyngiomas carry BRAF V600E mutations, but data are lacking with regard to the safety and efficacy of BRAF-MEK inhibition in patients with papillary craniopharyngiomas who have not undergone previous radiation therapy. METHODS: Eligible patients who had papillary craniopharyngiomas that tested positive for BRAF mutations, had not undergone radiation therapy previously, and had measurable disease received the BRAF-MEK inhibitor combination vemurafenib-cobimetinib in 28-day cycles. The primary end point of this single-group, phase 2 study was objective response at 4 months as determined with the use of centrally determined volumetric data. RESULTS: Of the 16 patients in the study, 15 (94%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 70 to 100) had a durable objective partial response or better to therapy. The median reduction in the volume of the tumor was 91% (range, 68 to 99). The median follow-up was 22 months (95% CI, 19 to 30) and the median number of treatment cycles was 8. Progression-free survival was 87% (95% CI, 57 to 98) at 12 months and 58% (95% CI, 10 to 89) at 24 months. Three patients had disease progression during follow-up after therapy had been discontinued; none have died. The sole patient who did not have a response stopped treatment after 8 days owing to toxic effects. Grade 3 adverse events that were at least possibly related to treatment occurred in 12 patients, including rash in 6 patients. In 2 patients, grade 4 adverse events (hyperglycemia in 1 patient and increased creatine kinase levels in 1 patient) were reported; 3 patients discontinued treatment owing to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In this small, single-group study involving patients with papillary craniopharyngiomas, 15 of 16 patients had a partial response or better to the BRAF-MEK inhibitor combination vemurafenib-cobimetinib. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03224767.).

Development and validation of an LC-MS/MS method to measure the BRAF inhibitors dabrafenib and encorafenib quantitatively and four major metabolites semi-quantitatively in human plasma.

This article describes the development and validation of a liquid-chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay for the simultaneous quantitation of the BRAF inhibitors dabrafenib and encorafenib, and semi-quantitation of their major metabolites (i.e., carboxy-dabrafenib, desmethyl-dabrafenib, hydroxy-dabrafenib, M42.5A) in human plasma. Analytes were extracted from human plasma by protein precipitation, followed by reversed phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Analyte detection was performed using tandem mass spectrometry with heated electrospray ionization operating in positive ion mode. The assay was validated in accordance with the current U.S. Food and Drug Administration Guidance on Bioanalytical Method Validation. Results showed that measurements were both accurate (94.6-112.0 %) and precise (within-run: 1.9-3.4 %; between-run: 1.7-12.0 %) spanning a concentration range of 5 to 2000 ng/mL for dabrafenib and 10 to 4000 ng/mL for encorafenib. Recoveries for these analytes were consistent with mean values ranging from 85.6 % to 90.9 %. The mean internal standard-normalized matrix factors for each drug ranged between 0.87 and 0.98 and were found to be precise (% RSD <6.4 %). Dabrafenib and encorafenib were stable in the final extract and in human plasma held under various storage conditions. The metabolites also passed the validation criteria for precision and selectivity. Finally, the clinical applicability of the assay was confirmed by (semi-)quantitation of all six analytes in plasma samples from cancer patients receiving standard-of-care treatment with dabrafenib and encorafenib. Reproducibility of the measured analyte concentrations in study samples was confirmed successfully by incurred sample reanalysis. In conclusion, this sensitive LC-MS/MS assay has been validated successfully and is suitable for therapeutic drug monitoring of dabrafenib and encorafenib and clinical pharmacokinetic studies with these BRAF inhibitors.

In silico Screening and Validation of Achyranthes aspera as a Potential Inhibitor of BRAF and NRAS in Controlling Thyroid Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Thyroid carcinoma (THCA) is one of the most prevalent endocrine tumors, accounting for 3.4% of all cancers diagnosed annually. Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) are the most prevalent genetic variation associated with thyroid cancer. Understanding thyroid cancer genetics will enhance diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. METHODS: This TCGA-based study analyzes thyroid cancer-associated highly mutated genes through highly robust in silico techniques. Pathway, gene expression, and survival studies were performed on the top 10 highly mutated genes (BRAF, NRAS, TG, TTN, HRAS, MUC16, ZFHX3, CSMD2, EIFIAX, SPTA1). Novel natural compounds from Achyranthes aspera Linn were discovered to target two highly mutated genes. The natural compounds and synthetic drugs used to treat thyroid cancer were subjected to comparative molecular docking against BRAF and NRAS targets. The ADME characteristics of Achyranthes aspera Linn compounds were also investigated. RESULTS: The gene expression analysis revealed that the expression of ZFHX3, MCU16, EIF1AX, HRAS, and NRAS was up-regulated in tumor cells while BRAF, TTN, TG, CSMD2, and SPTA1 were down-regulated in tumor cells. In addition, the protein-protein interaction network demonstrated that HRAS, BRAF, NRAS, SPTA1, and TG proteins have strong interactions with each other as compared to other genes. The ADMET analysis shows that seven compounds have druglike properties. These compounds were further studied for molecular docking studies. The compounds MPHY012847, IMPHY005295, and IMPHY000939 show higher binding affinity with BRAF than pimasertib. In addition, IMPHY000939, IMPHY000303, IMPHY012847, and IMPHY005295 showed a better binding affinity with NRAS than Guanosine Triphosphate. CONCLUSION: The outcomes of docking experiments conducted on BRAF and NRAS provide insight into natural compounds with pharmacological characteristics. These findings indicate that natural compounds derived from plants as a more promising cancer treatment option. Thus, the results of docking investigations conducted on BRAF and NRAS substantiate the conclusions that the molecule possesses the most suited drug-like qualities. Compared to other compounds, natural compounds are superior, and they are also druggable. This demonstrates that natural plant compounds can be an excellent source of potential anti-cancer agents. The preclinical research will pave the road for a possible anti-cancer agent.

[Ocular side effects of modern oncological therapy : Immunological checkpoint and MEK/BRAF signal transduction inhibitors]. / Okuläre Nebenwirkungen moderner onkologischer Therapie : Immunologische Checkpoint- und MEK/BRAF-Signaltransduktionsinhibitoren.

In recent years, checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of previously untreatable malignant tumors, significantly improving the life expectancy as well as quality of life in many cases. Checkpoint inhibitors comprise a group of drugs with different mechanisms of action. These include immunological checkpoint inhibitors (iCPI) and intracellular signal transduction inhibitors; however, both substance classes can cause inflammatory or toxic ocular side effects. The frequency of intraocular inflammation (uveitis) is reported to be ca. 1-2%, toxic side effects were observed in up to more than 50% of the patients treated with signal transduction inhibitors. In the following article the main mechanisms of these forms of treatment are characterized. Furthermore, this article presents the currently most frequently used therapeutic agents and their typical ophthalmological side effects to increase awareness and to draw attention to these still rare but increasingly more frequent findings.

Design, Synthesis, Antiproliferative Actions, and DFT Studies of New Bis-Pyrazoline Derivatives as Dual EGFR/BRAFV600E Inhibitors.

Some new Bis-pyrazoline hybrids 8-17 with dual EGFR and BRAFV600E inhibitors have been developed. The target compounds were synthesized and tested in vitro against four cancer cell lines. Compounds 12, 15, and 17 demonstrated strong antiproliferative activity with GI50 values of 1.05 µM, 1.50 µM, and 1.20 µM, respectively. Hybrids showed dual inhibition of EGFR and BRAFV600E. Compounds 12, 15, and 17 inhibited EGFR-like erlotinib and exhibited promising anticancer activity. Compound 12 is the most potent inhibitor of cancer cell proliferation and BRAFV600E. Compounds 12 and 17 induced apoptosis by increasing caspase 3, 8, and Bax levels, and resulted in the downregulation of the antiapoptotic Bcl2. The molecular docking studies verified that compounds 12, 15, and 17 have the potential to be dual EGFR/BRAFV600E inhibitors. Additionally, in silico ADMET prediction revealed that most synthesized bis-pyrazoline hybrids have low toxicity and adverse effects. DFT studies for the two most active compounds, 12 and 15, were also carried out. The values of the HOMO and LUMO energies, as well as softness and hardness, were computationally investigated using the DFT method. These findings agreed well with those of the in vitro research and molecular docking study.

Targeting the BRAF pathway in haematological diseases.

Since the recognition of BRAF V600E mutations in the majority of cases of hairy cell leukaemia, Erdheim-Chester disease and Langerhans cell histiocytosis, the targeted oral kinase inhibitors dabrafenib and vemurafenib have been adapted for their treatment. Like other targeted agents, these drugs produce high response rates and predictable but unique side effects. Physician familiarity is essential for the effective use of these agents. We review the Australian experience of BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy in these rare haematological cancers.

A phase I/II study of MCS110 with BRAF/MEK inhibition in patients with melanoma after progression on BRAF/MEK inhibition.

BACKGROUND: Prognosis for patients with metastatic melanoma has been improved dramatically with the development of BRAF/MEK directed therapy and immune checkpoint inhibition. However, resistance to therapy remains a challenge, particularly with BRAF/MEK targeted therapy which often has a limited duration of efficacy. Pre-clinical data suggest that adding CSF1 inhibition to BRAF/MEK targeted therapy may reduce resistance and increase efficacy. METHODS: We performed a phase I/II study to determine the safety and efficacy of CSF1 inhibition with MCS110 in combination with BRAF/MEK inhibition with dabrafenib/trametinib in patients with BRAF V600E/K mutant metastatic melanoma. The trial was terminated early due to a decision by the study sponsor to cease further development of MCS110. RESULTS: Between September 2018 to July 2019 six patients were enrolled on the study. Patients were evenly split between female (50%) and male (50%) with a median age of 59.5 yrs. (26-71). Five patients experienced grade 3 toxicities that were possibly related to one of the therapies, there were no grade 4 or grade 5 events. One patient had a partial response (PR) by RECIST 1.1, one patient had stable disease (SD), 3 patients had disease progression (PD). Median progression free survival was 2.3 months (90% CI: 1.3 mos to not reached). CONCLUSION: MCS110 in combination with dabrafenib and trametinib was reasonably well tolerated in a small melanoma population. One response was observed in this small sample of patients suggesting this combination might be worthy of further exploration.

Monitoring tumour resistance to the BRAF inhibitor combination regimen in colorectal cancer patients via circulating tumour DNA.

AIMS: This study aimed to identify mechanisms of drug resistance to the combination of vemurafenib, irinotecan, and cetuximab (VIC) in BRAFV600E metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: Forty-one patients with BRAFV600E mCRC from July 2018 and June 2020 were evaluated, with tissue and/or plasma samples collected. We profiled tissue and plasma samples using whole-exome sequencing and targeted sequencing of 425 cancer-relevant genes. Clinical cohort analysis from published studies was performed to consolidate our findings. RESULTS: BRAF mutant in baseline plasma and its dynamics are significantly associated with VIC-related response, and concurrent RNF43 mutation significantly sensitises tumour to VIC treatment. VIC resistance frequently involves genes in PI3K, MAPK pathway, and several novel resistance mechanisms such as TGFBR2 and SMAD4 mutations, and copy-number gains in PTK2, MYC, and GATA6 have been identified. We also firstly describe acquired altered genes in DNA damaging repair pathway, occurring in 33 % of patients after VIC treatment, and particularly, patients with this pre-treatment resistance subclones developed inferior responses, along with higher tumour mutation burden both at baseline and progression plasma. CONCLUSION: Analysis of ctDNA can provide novel insights into molecular resistance mechanisms to VIC in BRAFV600E mCRC patients, allowing accurate guidance for clinicians in personalised treatment strategies.

Peripheral neuropathies after BRAF and/or MEK inhibitor treatment: A pharmacovigilance study.

Reports suggested the potential occurrence of peripheral neuropathies (PN) in patients treated with BRAF (BRAFi) and/or MEK inhibitors (MEKi) for BRAF-activated tumours. We aimed to better characterize these PN. We queried the French pharmacovigilance database for all cases of PN attributed to BRAFi and/or MEKi. Fifteen patients were identified. Two main clinical PN phenotypes were seen. Six patients presented a length-dependent, axonal polyneuropathy: symptoms were mostly sensory and affecting the lower limbs; management and outcome were variable. Nine patients developed a demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: symptoms affected the four limbs and included hypoesthesia, weakness and ataxia; cranial nerves were involved in four cases; most patients received intravenous immunoglobulins or glucocorticoids, with variable outcome; one patient was rechallenged with a different BRAFi/MEKi combination with a rapid relapse in symptoms. In conclusion, patients under BRAFi/MEKi therapy may develop treatment-induced PN. Two main phenotypes can occur: a symmetric, axonal, length-dependent polyneuropathy and a demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

Efficacy and safety of anti-PD1 monotherapy or in combination with ipilimumab after BRAF/MEK inhibitors in patients with BRAF mutant metastatic melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Patients with V600BRAF mutant metastatic melanoma have higher rates of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with first-line anti-PD1 (PD1]+anti-CTLA-4 (IPI) versus PD1. Whether this is also true after BRAF/MEKi therapy is unknown. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of PD1 versus IPI +PD1 after BRAF/MEK inhibitors (BRAF/MEKi). METHODS: Patients with V600BRAF mutant metastatic melanoma treated with BRAF/MEKi who had subsequent PD1 versus IPI+PD1 at eight centers were included. The endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), PFS, OS and safety in each group. RESULTS: Of 200 patients with V600E (75%) or non-V600E (25%) mutant metastatic melanoma treated with BRAF/MEKi (median time of treatment 7.6 months; treatment cessation due to progressive disease in 77%), 115 (57.5%) had subsequent PD1 and 85 (42.5%) had IPI+PD1. Differences in patient characteristics between PD1 and IPI+PD1 groups included, age (med. 63 vs 54 years), time between BRAF/MEKi and PD1±IPI (16 vs 4 days), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) of ≥1 (62% vs 44%), AJCC M1C/M1D stage (72% vs 94%) and progressing brain metastases at the start of PD1±IPI (34% vs 57%). Median follow-up from PD1±IPI start was 37.8 months (95% CI, 33.9 to 52.9). ORR was 36%; 34% with PD1 vs 39% with IPI+PD1 (p=0.5713). Median PFS was 3.4 months; 3.4 with PD1 vs 3.6 months with IPI+PD1 (p=0.6951). Median OS was 15.4 months; 14.4 for PD1 vs 20.5 months with IPI+PD1 (p=0.2603). The rate of grade 3 or 4 toxicities was higher with IPI+PD1 (31%) vs PD1 (7%). ORR, PFS and OS were numerically higher with IPI+PD1 vs PD1 across most subgroups except for females, those with <10 days between BRAF/MEKi and PD1±IPI, and those with stage III/M1A/M1B melanoma. The combination of ECOG PS=0 and absence of liver metastases identified patients with >3 years OS (area under the curve, AUC=0.74), while ECOG PS ≥1, progressing brain metastases and presence of bone metastases predicted primary progression (AUC=0.67). CONCLUSIONS: IPI+PD1 and PD1 after BRAF/MEKi have similar outcomes despite worse baseline prognostic features in the IPI+PD1 group, however, IPI+PD1 is more toxic. A combination of clinical factors can identify long-term survivors, but less accurately those with primary resistance to immunotherapy after targeted therapy.

Resistance to BRAF/MEK Inhibition in Melanoma Is Mediated by the Androgen Receptor.

Androgen receptor (AR) expression increases upon BRAF/MEK inhibitor treatment, promoting resistance.

Androgen receptor blockade promotes response to BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy.

Treatment with therapy targeting BRAF and MEK (BRAF/MEK) has revolutionized care in melanoma and other cancers; however, therapeutic resistance is common and innovative treatment strategies are needed1,2. Here we studied a group of patients with melanoma who were treated with neoadjuvant BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy ( NCT02231775 , n = 51) and observed significantly higher rates of major pathological response (MPR; ≤10% viable tumour at resection) and improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) in female versus male patients (MPR, 66% versus 14%, P = 0.001; RFS, 64% versus 32% at 2 years, P = 0.021). The findings were validated in several additional cohorts2-4 of patients with unresectable metastatic melanoma who were treated with BRAF- and/or MEK-targeted therapy (n = 664 patients in total), demonstrating improved progression-free survival and overall survival in female versus male patients in several of these studies. Studies in preclinical models demonstrated significantly impaired anti-tumour activity in male versus female mice after BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy (P = 0.006), with significantly higher expression of the androgen receptor in tumours of male and female BRAF/MEK-treated mice versus the control (P = 0.0006 and P = 0.0025). Pharmacological inhibition of androgen receptor signalling improved responses to BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy in male and female mice (P = 0.018 and P = 0.003), whereas induction of androgen receptor signalling (through testosterone administration) was associated with a significantly impaired response to BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy in male and female patients (P = 0.021 and P < 0.0001). Together, these results have important implications for therapy.

[BRAF-MEK inhibitor therapy in melanoma]. / BRAF-MEK gátló terápiával elért eredményeink 118, metasztatikus melanómában szenvedo betegnél az Országos Onkológiai Intézetben.

We investigated the efficacy and safety of vemurafenib+cobimetinib (V+C) and dabrafenib+trametinib (D+T) based on real-life data. From 2015 and 2018 we have selected 118 BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma patients, treated with V+C and D+T in our institute. We retrospectively analyzed the overall response rate (ORR), the progression-free survival (PFS), the overall survival (OS) and the adverse events of the therapies. The median follow-up time was 18 months (3-43) with V+C and 12 months (3-43) with D+T. The median PFS was 8 months in the V+C and 8.5 months in the D+T group. Median OS was 18 months in V+C group and 12 months with D+T. The ORR was revealed to be 82% in D+T group and 76% in V+C group. Each combination displayed a slightly different safety profile. In our retrospective analysis both BRAF-MEK inhibitor combination therapies showed favorable efficacy with a slightly different spectrum of toxicity profile.

[mmunotherapy of cutaneous melanoma - update 2022]. / Immunterápiás lehetoségek a melanóma kezelésében ­ update 2022.

Melanoma treatment has been revolutionized during the last decade. Currently first line therapeutic options for advanced melanoma include immunotherapy with anti-PD-1 antibodies (combination of PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockers should be an option in a selected group of patients) or targeted therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors in BRAF V600 mutated tumors. This review aims to summarize long-term survival data of immunotherapy in cutaneous melanoma and to show possible directions of development in combined oncological modalities.